Logo

Category Theory for the Sciences

Large book cover: Category Theory for the Sciences

Category Theory for the Sciences
by

Publisher: The MIT Press
ISBN-13: 9780262320511
Number of pages: 496

Description:
This book shows that category theory can be useful outside of mathematics as a rigorous, flexible, and coherent modeling language throughout the sciences. Written in an engaging and straightforward style, and assuming little background in mathematics, the book is rigorous but accessible to non-mathematicians.

Home page url

Download or read it online for free here:
Read online
(online html)

Similar books

Book cover: Higher-Dimensional Categories: an illustrated guide bookHigher-Dimensional Categories: an illustrated guide book
by - University of Sheffield
This work gives an explanatory introduction to various definitions of higher-dimensional category. The emphasis is on ideas rather than formalities; the aim is to shed light on the formalities by emphasizing the intuitions that lead there.
(8823 views)
Book cover: Abstract and Concrete Categories: The Joy of CatsAbstract and Concrete Categories: The Joy of Cats
by - John Wiley & Sons
A modern introduction to the theory of structures via the language of category theory, the emphasis is on concrete categories. The first five chapters present the basic theory, while the last two contain more recent research results.
(13392 views)
Book cover: Category TheoryCategory Theory
- Wikibooks
This book is an introduction to category theory, written for those who have some understanding of one or more branches of abstract mathematics, such as group theory, analysis or topology. It contains examples drawn from various branches of math.
(7810 views)
Book cover: Notes on Categories and GroupoidsNotes on Categories and Groupoids
by - Van Nostrand Reinhold
A self-contained account of the elementary theory of groupoids and some of its uses in group theory and topology. Category theory appears as a secondary topic whenever it is relevant to the main issue, and its treatment is by no means systematic.
(10377 views)