The Elements Of Non-Euclidean Geometry
by Julian Lowell Coolidge
Publisher: Oxford At The Clarendon Press 1909
ISBN/ASIN: 1603861491
Number of pages: 282
Description:
Chapters Include: Foundation For Metrical Geometry In A Limited Region; Congruent Transformations; The Three Hypotheses; The Introduction Of Trigonometric Formulae; Analytic Formulae; Consistency And Significance Of The Axioms; The Geometric And Analytic Extension Of Space; The Groups Of Congruent Transformations; Point, Line, And Plane Treated Analytically; The Higher Line Geometry; The Circle And The Sphere; Conic Sections; Quadric Surfaces; Areas And Volumes; Introduction To Differential Geometry; etc.
Download or read it online for free here:
Download link
(1.2MB, PDF)
Similar books
The Elements of Non-Euclidean Geometryby D.M.Y. Sommerville - G. Bell & Sons Ltd.
Renowned for its lucid yet meticulous exposition, this text follows the development of non-Euclidean geometry from a fundamental analysis of the concept of parallelism to such advanced topics as inversion and transformations.
(12489 views)
Hyperbolic Geometryby J.W. Cannon, W.J. Floyd, R. Kenyon, W.R. Parry - MSRI
These notes are intended as a relatively quick introduction to hyperbolic geometry. They review the wonderful history of non-Euclidean geometry. They develop a number of the properties that are particularly important in topology and group theory.
(13615 views)
Non-Euclidean Geometryby Henry Manning - Ginn and Company
This book gives a simple and direct account of the Non-Euclidean Geometry, and one which presupposes but little knowledge of Mathematics. The entire book can be read by one who has taken the mathematical courses commonly given in our colleges.
(15772 views)
Euclid's Parallel Postulate: Its Nature, Validity and Place in Geometrical Systemsby John William Withers - Open Court Publishing Co.
The parallel postulate is the only distinctive characteristic of Euclid. To pronounce upon its validity and general philosophical significance without endeavoring to know what Non-Euclideans have done would be an inexcusable blunder ...
(8767 views)