Logo

Neutral and Non-Euclidean Geometries

Small book cover: Neutral and Non-Euclidean Geometries

Neutral and Non-Euclidean Geometries
by

Publisher: UNC Charlotte
Number of pages: 145

Description:
In this course you are introduced, or re-introduced, to the method of Mathematical Proof. You will be introduced to new and interesting areas in Geometry, with most of the time spent on the study of Hyperbolic Geometry. We will learn one of the Fundamental Theorems of Mathematics that many students never get to see.

Home page url

Download or read it online for free here:
Read online
(online html)

Similar books

Book cover: Geometry with an Introduction to Cosmic TopologyGeometry with an Introduction to Cosmic Topology
by
This text develops non-Euclidean geometry and geometry on surfaces at a level appropriate for undergraduate students who completed a multivariable calculus course and are ready to practice habits of thought needed in advanced undergraduate courses.
(2864 views)
Book cover: The Elements of Non-Euclidean GeometryThe Elements of Non-Euclidean Geometry
by - G.Bell & Sons Ltd.
Renowned for its lucid yet meticulous exposition, this text follows the development of non-Euclidean geometry from a fundamental analysis of the concept of parallelism to such advanced topics as inversion and transformations.
(7009 views)
Book cover: The Elements of Non-Euclidean Plane Geometry and TrigonometryThe Elements of Non-Euclidean Plane Geometry and Trigonometry
by - Longmans, Green and co.
In this book the author has attempted to treat the Elements of Non-Euclidean Plane Geometry and Trigonometry in such a way as to prove useful to teachers of Elementary Geometry in schools and colleges. Hyperbolic and elliptic geometry are covered.
(5935 views)
Book cover: Euclid's Parallel Postulate: Its Nature, Validity and Place in Geometrical SystemsEuclid's Parallel Postulate: Its Nature, Validity and Place in Geometrical Systems
by - Open Court Publishing Co.
The parallel postulate is the only distinctive characteristic of Euclid. To pronounce upon its validity and general philosophical significance without endeavoring to know what Non-Euclideans have done would be an inexcusable blunder ...
(3979 views)